Radio network node and method for using positioning gap indication for enhancing positioning performance

ABSTRACT

A wireless communications network is described herein in which positioning measurements (e.g., inter-frequency OTDOA measurements and inter-frequency E-CID measurements) may be performed on different frequencies and measurement gaps may be requested for such measurements. In one embodiment, a radio network node (e.g., eNodeB, responsible node) is described for configuring a measurement gap for positioning to be used by a user equipment (UE).

CLAIM OF PRIORITY

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser.No. 61/471,303 filed on Apr. 4, 2011. The contents of this document arehereby incorporated by reference herein.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a wireless communications network inwhich positioning measurements (e.g., inter-frequency OTDOA measurementsor inter-frequency E-CID measurements) may be performed on differentfrequencies and measurement gaps may be requested for such measurements.In one embodiment, a radio network node (e.g., eNodeB, responsible node)is described for configuring a measurement gap for positioning to beused by a user equipment (UE).

BACKGROUND

The following abbreviations are herewith defined, at least some of whichare referred to within the following description about the prior art andthe present invention.

3GPP 3^(rd) Generation Partnership Project

AECID Adaptive E-CID

A-GNSS Assisted-GNSS

A-GPS Assisted-GPS

ANR Automatic Neighbor Relation

AoA Angle-of-Arrival

BS Base Station

CDMA Code Division Multiple Access

CQI Channel Quality Indicator

CRS Cell Specific Reference Signals

DRX Discontinuous Reception

E-CID Enhanced Cell Identification

eICIC Enhanced Inter-cell Interference Coordination

eNodeB Evolved Node B

E-SMLC Evolved SMLC

E-UTRAN Evolved UTRAN

GMLC Gateway Mobile Location Centre

GNSS Global Navigational Satellite System

GPS Global Positioning System

GSM Global System for Mobile Communications

LBS Location-Based Service

LCS Location Services

LPP LTE Positioning Protocol

LPPa LPP Annex

LTE Long-Term Evolution

MDT Minimization of Drive Tests

MME Mobile Management Entity

MST Multi-Standard Radio

O & M Operations & Maintenance

OMA Open Mobile Alliance

OTDOA Observed Time Difference of Arrival

PCI Physical Cell Identity

PDN GW Packet Data Network Gateway

P-GW Packet-Gateway

PRS Positioning Reference Signal

RAN Radio Access Network

RAT Radio Access Technology

RB Resource Block

RRC Radio Resource Control

RRM Radio Resource Management

RS Reference Signal

RSRP Reference Signal Received Power

RSRQ Reference Signal Received Quality

RSSI Received Signal Strength Indicator

RSTD Reference Signal Time Difference

S-GW Serving-Gateway

SLP SUPL Location Platform

SLC SUPL Location Center

SMLC Serving Mobile Location Center

SON Self Organizing Network

SPC Signalling Point Code

SUPL Secure User Plane Location

TA Timing Advance

UE User Equipment

UMTS Universal Mobile Telecommunications System

UTDOA Uplink Time Difference Of Arrival

UTRA Universal Terrestrial Radio Access

WCDMA Wideband Code Division Multiple Access

The possibility of identifying the geographical location of a user(e.g., wireless terminal, UE) in a telecommunications network hasenabled a large variety of commercial and non-commercial services, e.g.,navigation assistance, social networking, location-aware advertising,emergency calls, etc. Different services may have different positioningaccuracy requirements which are imposed by the application. In addition,some regulatory requirements on the positioning accuracy for basicemergency services exist in some countries, i.e. FCC E911 in US.

In many environments, the position of the wireless terminal can beaccurately estimated by using positioning methods based on GPS (GlobalPositioning System). Nowadays, telecommunication networks often have apossibility to assist UEs in order to improve the terminal receiversensitivity and GPS start-up performance (Assisted-GPS positioning, orA-GPS). GPS or A-GPS receivers, however, may not necessarily beavailable in all wireless terminals. Furthermore, GPS is known to oftenfail in indoor environments and urban canyons. Thus, a complementaryterrestrial positioning method, called Observed Time Difference ofArrival (OTDOA), has been standardized by 3GPP. In addition to OTDOA,the LTE standard also specifies methods, procedures and signalingsupport for Enhanced Cell ID (E-CID) and A-GNSS. Plus, a positioningmethod known as Uplink Time Difference Of Arrival (UTDOA) is also beingstandardized for LTE.

1. Positioning in LTE

The three key network elements in an LTE positioning architecture arethe LCS Client, the LCS target device (e.g., terminal) and the LCSServer. The LCS Server is a physical or logical entity that managespositioning for the LCS target device by collecting measurements andother location information, assisting the terminal in measurements whennecessary, and estimating the LCS target location. The LCS Client is asoftware and/or hardware entity that interacts with the LCS Server forthe purpose of obtaining location information for one or more LCS targetdevices, i.e. the entities being positioned. The LCS Client may residein the LCS target device itself. The LCS Client sends a request to theLCS Server to obtain location information, and the LCS Server processesand serves the received request and sends the positioning result andoptionally a velocity estimate to the LCS Client. A positioning requestcan be originated from the terminal or the network.

The position calculation can be conducted, for example, by the LTE's LCSserver (e.g., E-SMLC or SLP) or by the UE. The former approachcorresponds to what is known as the UE-assisted positioning mode, whilethe latter approach corresponds to what is known as the UE-basedpositioning mode.

The LTE currently supports two positioning protocols namely LPP and LPPawhich operate via the radio network. The LPP is a point-to-pointprotocol between the LCS Server and the LCS target device, used in orderto position the target device. LPP can be used both in the user andcontrol plane, and multiple LPP procedures are allowed in series and/orin parallel thereby reducing latency. LPPa is a protocol between theeNodeB and the LCS Server and is specified only for control-planepositioning procedures, although it still can assist user-planepositioning by querying eNodeBs for information and eNodeB measurements.In this case, the SUPL protocol can be used as a transport for LPP inthe user plane. The LPP also has a possibility to convey LPP extensionmessages inside LPP messages, e.g., currently OMA LPP extensions arebeing specified (LPPe) to allow, e.g., for operator- ormanufacturer-specific assistance data or assistance data that cannot beprovided with LPP or to support other position reporting formats or newpositioning methods. The LPPe may also be embedded into messages ofother positioning protocol, which is not necessarily LPP.

A high-level architecture of a radio network 100, as it is currentlystandardized in LTE, is illustrated in FIG. 1 (PRIOR ART), where the LCStarget is a terminal 102, and the LCS Server is an E-SMLC 104 or an SLP106. In this figure, the control plane positioning protocols with theE-SMLC 104 as the terminating point are LPP, LPPa and LCS-AP, and theuser plane positioning protocol is SUPL and SUPL/LPP. The SLP 106 maycomprise two components SPC 108 and SLC 110 which may also reside indifferent nodes. In an example implementation, the SPC 108 has aproprietary interface with the E-SMLC 104, and an LLP interface with theSLC 110 while the SLC 110 communicates with a P-GW 112 (PDN-Gateway 112)and an external LCS Client 114. One skilled in the art will recognizeand understand this high-level architecture of the radio network 100including the eNodeB 116, the GMLC 118, the MME 120, the S-GW 122, theRAN 126, and the core network 128. Additional positioning architectureelements may also be deployed to further enhance performance of specificpositioning methods. For example, deploying radio beacons 130 (twoshown) is a cost-efficient solution which may significantly improvepositioning performance indoors and also outdoors by allowing moreaccurate positioning, for example, with proximity location techniques.

2. Positioning Methods

To meet LBS demands, the LTE network deploys a range of complementingpositioning methods characterized by having different performances indifferent environments. Depending on where the measurements areconducted and the final position is calculated, the positioning methodscan be UE-based, UE-assisted or network-based, each with their ownadvantages. The following positioning methods are available in the LTEstandard for both the control plane and the user plane:

-   -   Cell ID (CID),    -   UE-assisted and network-based E-CID, including network-based        angle of arrival (AoA),    -   UE-based and UE-assisted A-GNSS (including A-GPS),    -   UE-assisted Observed Time Difference of Arrival (OTDOA).

Hybrid positioning, fingerprinting positioning/pattern matching andadaptive E-CID (AECID) do not require additional standardization and aretherefore also possible to be implemented in the LTE network.Furthermore, there may also be UE-based versions of the positioningmethods above, e.g. UE-based GNSS (e.g. GPS) or UE-based OTDOA, etc.There may also be some alternative positioning methods such as proximitybased location. UTDOA may also be standardized in a later LTE release,since it is currently under discussion in 3GPP. More methods, LTE andnon-LTE, are supported with LPPe. Similar positioning methods, which mayhave different names, also exist in other RATs, e.g., CDMA, WCDMA orGSM.

2.1 E-CID Positioning

The E-CID positioning method exploits the advantage of low-complexityand fast positioning with CID which exploits the network knowledge ofgeographical areas associated with cell IDs, but enhances positioningfurther with more measurement types. With Enhanced Cell ID (E-CID), thefollowing sources of position information are involved: the CellIdentification (CID) and the corresponding geographical description ofthe serving cell, the Timing Advance (TA) of the serving cell, and theCIDs and the corresponding signal measurements of the cells (up to 32cells in LTE, including the serving cell), as well as AoA measurements.The following UE measurements can be utilized for E-CID in LTE: (1)E-UTRAN carrier Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI); (2) ReferenceSignal Received Power (RSRP); (3) Reference Signal Received Quality(RSRQ); and (4) UE Rx-Tx time difference. The E-UTRAN measurementsavailable for E-CID are eNodeB Rx-Tx time difference (also called TAType 2), TA Type 1 being (eNodeB Rx-Tx time difference)+(UE Rx-Tx timedifference), and UL AoA. The UE Rx-Tx measurements are typically usedfor the serving cell, while e.g. RSRP and RSRQ as well AoA can beutilized for any cell and can also be conducted on a frequency differentfrom that of the serving cell. The UE E-CID measurements are reported bythe UE 102 to the positioning server (e.g. Evolved SMLC, or E-SMLC 104,or SUPL Location Platform, or SLP 106, in LTE) over the LTE PositioningProtocol (LPP), and the E-UTRAN E-CID measurements are reported by theeNodeB 116 to the positioning server 104 over the LPP Annex protocol(LPPa). The UE 102 may receive assistance data from the network e.g. viaLPPe (no LPP assistance for E-CID is currently specified in thestandard, however, it may be sent via LPP extension protocol, LPPe).

2.2 OTDOA Positioning

The OTDOA positioning method makes use of the measured timing ofdownlink signals received from multiple eNodeBs 116 (one shown inFIG. 1) at the UE 102. The UE 102 measures the timing of the receivedsignals using assistance data received from the LCS server 104 and 106,and the resulting measurements are used to locate the UE 102 in relationto the neighbouring eNodeBs 116.

In the OTDOA positioning method, the terminal 102 (UE 102) measures thetiming differences for downlink reference signals received from multipledistinct locations. For each (measured) neighbor cell, the UE 102measures Reference Signal Time Difference (RSTD) which is the relativetiming difference between neighbor cell and the reference cell. The UEposition estimate is then found as the intersection of hyperbolascorresponding to the measured RSTDs. At least three measurements fromgeographically dispersed base stations (eNodeBs 116) with a goodgeometry are needed to solve for two coordinates of the terminal 102 andthe receiver clock bias. In order to solve for position, preciseknowledge of the transmitter locations and transmit timing offset isneeded.

To enable positioning in LTE and facilitate positioning measurements ofa proper quality and for a sufficient number of distinct locations, newphysical signals dedicated for positioning (positioning referencesignals, or PRS) have been introduced and low-interference positioningsubframes have been specified in 3GPP.

The PRS are transmitted from one antenna port (R6) according to apre-defined pattern. A frequency shift, which is a function of PhysicalCell Identity (PCI), can be applied to the specified PRS patterns togenerate orthogonal patterns and modeling the effective frequency reuseof six, which makes it possible to significantly reduce neighbour cellinterference on the measured PRS and thus improve positioningmeasurements. Even though PRS have been specifically designed forpositioning measurements and in general are characterized by bettersignal quality than other reference signals, the standard does notmandate using PRS. Other reference signals, e.g. cell-specific referencesignals (CRS) may also be used for positioning measurements.

The PRS are transmitted in pre-defined positioning subframes grouped byseveral consecutive subframes (N_(PRS)), i.e. one positioning occasion.Positioning occasions occur periodically with a certain periodicity of Nsubframes, i.e. the time interval between two positioning occasions. Thestandardized periods N are 160, 320, 640, and 1280 ms, and the number ofconsecutive subframes may be 1, 2, 4, or 6.

3. Inter-Frequency, Inter-Band and Inter-Rat Measurements

It is mandatory for all UEs to support all intra-RAT measurements (i.e.inter-frequency and intra-band measurements) and meet the associatedrequirements. However the inter-band and inter-RAT measurements are UEcapabilities, which are reported to the network during the call setup.The UE supporting certain inter-RAT measurements should meet thecorresponding requirements. For example a UE supporting LTE and WCDMAshould support intra-LTE measurements, intra-WCDMA measurements andinter-RAT measurements (i.e. measuring WCDMA when serving cell is LTEand measuring LTE when serving cell is WCDMA). Hence, the network canuse these capabilities according to its strategy. These capabilities arehighly driven by factors such as market demand, cost, typical networkdeployment scenarios, frequency allocation, etc. The UE 102 may alsoreport specifically for the positioning purpose, e.g. upon a networkrequest, the set of supported frequency bands.

3.1 Inter-Frequency Measurements

Inter-frequency measurements may in principle be considered for anypositioning method, even though currently not all measurements arespecified by the standard as intra- and inter-frequency measurements.The examples of inter-frequency measurements currently specified by thestandard are Reference Signal Time Difference (RSTD) used for OTDOA,RSRP and RSRQ which may be used e.g. for fingerprinting or E-CID. Thereare, however, no requirements for inter-frequency E-CID measurements.

The UE performs inter-frequency and inter-RAT measurements inmeasurement gaps. The measurements may be done for various purposes:mobility, positioning, self organizing network (SON), minimization ofdrive tests etc. Furthermore the same gap pattern is used for all typesof inter-frequency and inter-RAT measurements. Therefore, E-UTRAN mustprovide a single measurement gap pattern with constant gap duration forconcurrent monitoring (i.e. cell detection and measurements) of allfrequency layers and RATs.

In LTE, the measurement gaps are configured by the network to enablemeasurements on the other LTE frequencies and/or other RATs (e.g. UTRA,GSM, CDMA2000, etc). The gap configuration is signaled to the UE overRRC protocol as part of the measurement configuration. If the UErequires measurement gaps for OTDOA positioning measurements then it maysend an indication to the network, e.g. eNodeB, upon which the networkmay configure the measurement gaps. Furthermore, the measurement gapsmay need to be configured according to a certain rule, e.g.inter-frequency RSTD measurements for OTDOA require that the measurementgaps are configured according to the inter-frequency requirements in3GPP 36.133, Section 8.1.2.6, release 9 version 9.4.0 (2010-06), e.g.gap pattern #0 shall be used when inter-frequency RSTD measurements areconfigured and there should not be measurement gaps overlapping with PRSoccasions of cells in the serving frequency.

3.2 Inter-RAT Measurements

In general, in LTE the inter-RAT measurements are typically definedsimilar to inter-frequency measurements, e.g. they may also requireconfiguring measurement gaps like for inter-frequency measurements, butjust with more measurements restrictions and often more relaxedrequirements for inter-RAT measurements. As a special example, there mayalso be multiple networks using the overlapping sets of RATs. Theexamples of inter-RAT measurements specified currently for LTE are UTRAFDD Common Pilot Channel (CPICH) Received Signal Code Power (RSCP), UTRAFDD carrier RSSI, UTRA FDD CPICH Ec/No, GSM carrier RSSI, and CDMA20001xRTT Pilot Strength.

For positioning, assuming that LTE FDD and LTE TDD are treated asdifferent RATs, the current standard defines inter-RAT requirements onlyfor FDD-TDD and TDD-FDD measurements, and the requirements are differentin the two cases. There are no other inter-RAT measurements specifiedwithin any separate RAT for the purpose of positioning and which arepossible to report to the positioning node (e.g. E-SMLC in LTE).

Inter-RAT positioning measurement reporting may be possible with LPPe.However, for UEs requiring measurement gaps the current standard doesnot allow configuring the gaps for other than inter-frequency RSTDmeasurements.

3.3 Inter-Band Measurements

An inter-band measurement refers to the measurement done by the UE on atarget cell on the carrier frequency belonging to the frequency bandwhich is different than that of the serving cell. Both inter-frequencyand inter-RAT measurements can be intra-band or inter-band.

The motivation of inter-band measurements is that most of the UEs todaysupport multiple bands even for the same technology. This is driven bythe interest from service providers; a single service provider may owncarriers in different bands and would like to make efficient use ofcarriers by performing load balancing on different carriers. A wellknown example is that of multi-band GSM terminal with 800/900/1800/1900bands.

Furthermore, the UE may also support multiple technologies e.g. GSM,UTRA FDD and E-UTRAN FDD. Since all UTRA and E-UTRA bands are common,the multi-RAT UE may support same bands for all the supported RATs.

4. Positioning Measurement Requirements in LTE

For E-CID, there are intra-frequency UE Rx-Tx accuracy and reportingdelay requirements. No inter-frequency requirements are currentlydefined for E-CID measurements.

OTDOA uses RSTD measurements performed by the UE. For UE-assisted OTDOA,i.e., when the UE reports the measurements to the positioning node(e.g., E-SMLC), the following requirements have been defined:

-   -   Intra-frequency RSTD accuracy requirements,    -   Inter-frequency RSTD accuracy requirements,    -   Intra-frequency RSTD reporting delay requirements for FDD,    -   Intra-frequency RSTD reporting delay requirements for TDD,    -   Inter-frequency RSTD reporting delay requirements for FDD-FDD,    -   Inter-frequency RSTD reporting delay requirements for TDD-FDD,    -   Inter-frequency RSTD reporting delay requirements for TDD-TDD,    -   Inter-frequency RSTD reporting delay requirements for FDD-TDD.        For each of the inter-frequency requirements, two scenarios are        considered:    -   Scenario 1: inter-frequency RSTD measurements are performed over        the reference cell and neighbour cells, which belong to the        inter-frequency carrier frequency f2.    -   Scenario 2: inter-frequency RSTD measurements are performed over        the reference cell and the neighbour cells, which belong to the        serving carrier frequency f1 and the inter-frequency carrier        frequency f2, respectively.

Scenario 1 corresponds to Note 1 in, e.g., Table 8.1.2.6.1-1 of theaforementioned 3GPP 36.133 standard, while Scenario 2 corresponds toNote 2 in the same table.

The requirements are generic with respect to the frequency channels andfrequency bands, to i.e. the requirements are the same for any twodifferent f1 and f2, independently on their absolute and relativelocation in the spectrum, e.g., being common for inter-frequencyintra-band and inter-band. This generic approach with regard to thefrequency channels and bands has been used for the specification of theother measurement requirements e.g. mobility measurement requirementssuch as RSRP and RSRQ in LTE. Note also that the requirements arecurrently common for inter-frequency. Furthermore, there may also beinter-RAT measurements, e.g., a UE connected to CDMA is performing LTERSTD measurements.

To ensure that the positioning requirements are met, test cases havebeen specified by the standard, based on which the UEs are tested. Thecurrently specified positioning test cases assume that the timinginformation for at least one cell (serving cell) in the assistance datais known to the UE, i.e., the UEs in the tests are not required toacquire the timing information of any of the cells. In these tests, theUE is required to report the positioning measurements (i.e. RSTD) withinthe test requirements. Failure to do so shall lead to the failure of thetest. Hence, if prior to the start of the actual test the UE under testdoes not have the timing information of any of the cells to be measuredfor positioning, then it is quite likely that the UE will fail the test.

SUMMARY

A radio network node, a method for configuring a measurement gap forpositioning, and a UE are described in the independent claims of thepresent application. Advantageous embodiments of radio network node, themethod for configuring a measurement gap for positioning, and the UEhave been described in the dependent claims of the present application.

In particular embodiments, a radio network node is provided forconfiguring a measurement gap for positioning to be used by a userequipment (UE). The radio network node comprises: (a) a processor; and(b) a memory that stores processor-executable instructions where theprocessor interfaces with the memory and executes theprocessor-executable instructions to enable following: (i) receive anindication indicating that the UE needs measurement gaps forpositioning; (ii) verify parameters in the indication to determine ifone or more pre-defined conditions are met to indicate that the UE isable to perform inter-frequency positioning measurements; (iii) decideon whether to configure the measurement gaps; and (iv) if decided toconfigure the measurement gaps then determine measurement gapconfiguration and send the measurement gap configuration to the UE.

In yet other embodiments, a method is provided to be implemented by aradio network node for configuring a measurement gap for performing atleast one positioning measurement to be used by a user equipment (UE).The method comprising the steps of: (a) receiving an indicationindicating that the UE needs measurement gaps for positioning; (b)verifying parameters in the indication to determine if one or morepre-defined conditions are met to indicate that the UE is able toperform inter-frequency positioning measurements; (c) deciding onwhether to configure the measurement gaps; and (d) if decided toconfigure the measurement gaps then determining measurement gapconfiguration and sending the measurement gap configuration to the UE.

In yet other embodiments, a user equipment is provided that comprises:(a) a processor; and (b) a memory that stores processor-executableinstructions where the processor interfaces with the memory and executesthe processor-executable instructions to enable following: (i) sending,to a radio network node, an indication indicating a need for measurementgaps for positioning; and (ii) receiving, from the radio network node,measurement gap configuration. The indication comprises one or more ofthe following parameters: a need indication; measurement gap purpose;one or more frequencies; one or more offsets indicating an occurrence ofmeasurements that require measurement gaps; one or more pairs of afrequency and the corresponding offset for that frequency; periodicityof measurements that require measurement gaps or a preferred measurementgap pattern; cell identifications; radio access technology (RAT); typeof service or session; emergency indication; and overall duration overwhich the measurement gaps are required.

In still yet other embodiments, a user equipment is provided thatcomprises: (a) a processor; and (b) a memory that storesprocessor-executable instructions where the processor interfaces withthe memory and executes the processor-executable instructions to enablefollowing: (i) configure autonomous gaps for positioning measurementsbased on a pre-defined rule or for a group of gap-assistant positioningmeasurements.

Additional aspects of particular embodiments of the described solutionswill be set forth, in part, in the detailed description, figures and anyclaims which follow, and in part will be derived from the detaileddescription, or can be learned by practice of the invention. It is to beunderstood that both the foregoing general description and the followingdetailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are notrestrictive of the invention as disclosed.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A more complete understanding of particular embodiments of the proposedsolutions may be obtained by reference to the following detaileddescription when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings:

FIG. 1 (PRIOR ART) is a high-level architecture of a radio network as itis currently standardized in LTE;

FIG. 2 is a diagram of an exemplary network including a UE, a radionetwork node (e.g., base station, eNodeB) and a positioning server(e.g., LTE's E-SMLC/SLP) configured in accordance with an embodiment ofthe present invention;

FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating the steps of an exemplary method thatis implemented the radio network node to configure a measurement gap forpositioning to be used by the UE in accordance to an embodiment of thepresent invention;

FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating the steps associated with a receiveindicator step of the method shown in FIG. 3 in accordance to anembodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating the steps associated with adetermined measurement gap configuration step of the method shown inFIG. 3 in accordance to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating the steps associated with a decidethe measurement gap configuration step of the method shown in FIG. 5 inaccordance to an embodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating the steps associated with a decidemeasurement gap configuration based on non-positioning measurements stepof the method shown in FIG. 5 in accordance to an embodiment of thepresent invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

At least the following problems have been identified by the inventorswith the positioning methods described above:

-   -   Methods and rules for verifying parameters included in the        measurement gap indication message may be desirable to ensure        the proper usage of measurement to gaps.    -   The measurement gap indication message may contain multiple        parameters which may indicate the need for different gap        configurations.        -   Methods for resolving such parameter conflict situations are            necessary.    -   Measurement gaps may be used for other purposes than        positioning, so the network may decide to not        configure/reconfigure measurement gaps.        -   There are currently no criteria or requirements for deciding            whether gaps for positioning must be            configured/reconfigured, which may negatively impact            emergency positioning.    -   There are requirements on inter-frequency positioning        measurements, but there are no requirements on the network for        measurement gap configuration and there is no possibility for        UEs to use autonomous gaps for positioning.        -   Currently measurement gap configuration is controlled by            eNodeBs, except for autonomous gaps decided by UEs that are,            however, not allowed for positioning,        -   Delayed measurement gap configuration/reconfiguration (e.g.            to ensure measurement occasions are covered by the gaps)            will impact the measurement accuracy (the UE may move) and            the positioning measurement reporting time, which will            degrade the positioning QoS.

Accordingly, there has been and is a need to address these problems andother problems to enhance the performance of determining a position of aterminal (e.g., UE). These needs and other needs are satisfied byparticular embodiments of the solutions described herein.

Accordingly, FIG. 2 shows a diagram of an exemplary network 200including a UE 202, a radio network node 204 (e.g., base station 204,eNodeB 204) and a positioning server 206 (e.g., LTE's E-SMLC/SLP 206)configured in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.The example network 200 may include one or more instances of the UE 202,one or more radio network nodes 204 capable of communicating with theUEs 202, and the positioning server 206 (e.g., represented collectivelyby an E-SMLC and SLP) capable of communicating with the radio networknodes 204, along with any additional elements suitable to supportcommunication between UEs 202 or between one UE 202 and anothercommunication device (such as a landline telephone). Although the UE 202may represent a communication device that includes any suitablecombination of hardware and/or software, the UE 202 may, in particularembodiments, represent a device such as the illustrated exemplary UE 202which includes an antenna 208, a transceiver 210, a processor 212, and amemory 214. Additionally, the radio network node 204 may include anysuitable combination of hardware and/or software, where the illustratedexemplary radio network node 204 includes an antenna 216, a transceiver218, a network interface 220, a processor 222, and a memory 224.Similarly, although the positioning server 206 may represent one or morenetwork nodes that include any suitable combination of hardware and/orsoftware, the positioning server 206 may, in particular embodiments,represent devices such as the illustrated exemplary positioning server206 which includes a network interface 226, a processor 228, and amemory 230. In one embodiment, the UE 202, the radio network node 204and the positioning server 206 could be incorporated within and enhancethe LTE network 100 shown in FIG. 1. The UE 202, the radio network node204, and the positioning server 206 all include additional componentsand functionalities that are well known in the art but for clarity onlythe components and functionality needed to describe and enable thepresent invention have been described herein.

Referring to FIG. 3, there is a flowchart illustrating the steps of anexemplary method 300 that is implemented by the radio network node 204to configure a measurement gap for positioning to be used by the UE 202in accordance to an embodiment of the present invention. The radionetwork node 204 includes the processor 212 and the memory 214 thatstores processor-executable instructions where the processor 212interfaces with the memory 214 and executes the processor-executableinstructions to enable following steps: (1) receive an indication 232indicating that the UE 202 needs measurement gaps for positioning (step302—see also FIG. 4); (2) verify parameters in the indication 232 todetermine if one or more pre-defined to conditions are met to indicatethat the UE 202 is able to perform inter-frequency positioningmeasurements (step 304); (3) if the UE 202 is not able to performinter-frequency positioning, measurements, then acquire more informationor ignore the indication 232 (step 306); (4) if the UE 202 is able toperform inter-frequency positioning measurements, then decide on whetherto configure the measurement gaps (step 308); (5) if decided not toconfigure the measurement gaps, then end (step 310); (6) if decided toconfigure the measurement gaps then determine a measurement gapconfiguration 234 (step 312—see also FIG. 5); and (7) send themeasurement gap configuration 234 to the UE 202 (step 314). A detaileddiscussion about each of these steps 302, 304, 306, 308, 310, 312 and312 is provided next.

1. RECEIVE INDICATION 232 (STEP 302)

As discussed herein there are particular embodiments of the proposedsolutions which utilize methods and rules for deciding the measurementgap configuration 234 based on the received indication 232 (or receivedrequest 232) indicating the need for measurement gaps for thepositioning purpose. The methods and rules are based on the assumptionthat the indication 232 is received by the radio network node 204deciding the measurement gaps (also referred to herein as theresponsible node 204). The indication 232 may be received either fromthe UE 202 (as shown) (e.g. via RRC as described in 3GPP TS 36.331,v10.1.0 (2011-03)) or from another network node (e.g., the positioningnode 206). At least in some embodiments of the present invention, themeasurement gaps may be requested for positioning also for UEs that ingeneral are capable of performing inter-frequency measurements withoutgaps, e.g. to reduce the UE complexity for positioning. In any case, theindication 232 may contain e.g. one or more of the following:

-   -   A predetermined need indication notifying the radio network node        204 of the UE's need for measurement gaps (e.g. a “start”        indicator or a boolean parameter in a predetermined field),    -   A measurement gap purpose indicating the purpose for which the        UE needs measurement gaps (e.g., a specific positioning method        or MDT or a specific positioning measurement in a positioning        method),    -   One or more frequencies,    -   One or more offsets indicating the occurrence of measurements        that require measurement gaps,    -   One or more pairs, each pair including a frequency and the        corresponding offset for that frequency,    -   Periodicity of the measurements that require measurement gaps or        the preferred measurement gap pattern,    -   Cell IDs e.g. PCI, CGI, CSG indicator etc.    -   Positioning session identifier to which the measurement gap        request or the indication relates,    -   RAT,    -   Type of service or session    -   Emergency indication,    -   Overall duration over which the gaps are required

As suggested above, particular embodiments may incorporate a needindication into indication 232. In such embodiments, the need indicationmay represent a predetermined message or an information element which issent by the UE to its radio network node 204 to indicate that the UEneeds measurement gaps for a positioning measurement. For example theindication may be predetermined for a particular type of positioningmeasurement e.g. OTDOA inter-frequency RSTD measurement.

As also suggested above, particular embodiments may incorporate ameasurement gap purpose into indication 232. In such embodiments, themeasurement gap purpose may, as one example, indicate that the UE needsmeasurement gaps for OTDOA positioning measurements. As another example,the measurement gap purpose may explicitly indicate that the UE needsmeasurement gaps for inter-frequency RSTD measurement which is one ofthe OTDOA positioning measurements. As yet another example themeasurement gap purpose may explicitly indicate that the UE needsmeasurement gaps for RSRP measurement which is one of the E-CIDpositioning measurements.

If some information above is provided relative to another (measured)cell (e.g. an offset with respect to the SFN0 of the serving cell), therelation between the parameters for neighbor cells may need to be knownand a conversion to the corresponding cell-specific parameter (e.g., tothe offset of a neighbor non-serving cell) may need to be performedprior to performing the described herein methods and rules.Alternatively, the conversion of the cell-specific parameters (e.g. PRSoffset) may be performed to relative ones with respect to the currentcell (e.g., a positioning occasion offset of a neighbor cell relative tothe reference SFN such as SFN#0 of the current cell). The conversionresults may be maintained and stored in a table in the radio networknode 204 (responsible node 204). Another alternative is e.g. to convertthe relative positioning occasion offset of a neighbor cell with respectto a given cell positioning occasion and the cell-specific positioningoccasion offset of the given cell to the relative positioning occasionoffset of the neighbor cell with respect to the reference SFN (e.g. SFN#0) of the given cell.

The information about the timing offsets for neighbor cells may benecessary e.g. to enable the conversion and verification of therequested measurement gap configuration for neighbor cell measurements.The timing offsets (e.g. SFN offsets and/or cell-specific positioningoccasion offsets and/or relative positioning occasion offset) may bepre-configured (e.g. in a synchronous network) or calculated by apre-defined rule or obtained from a table or from another node e.g. aneighbor radio node (e.g. via X2) or a positioning node or an O&M or ahome base station (BS) gateway.

The relations between the parameters of neighbor cells and a given cellmay be stored in a table and used for the measurement gap configurationand methods described herein. The table may be stored and maintained inthe radio network node 204 (responsible node 204) or there may be aneighbor relation table in another network node (e.g. O&M). In view ofthe above, FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating the steps of a method 400that can be implemented by the radio network node 204 that uponreceiving the indication 232 determines if the indication 232 hasinformation for the measured cell relative to a given cell (step 402)and if no then continue to step 304 and if yes then perform a conversionof the measure cell parameters to corresponding given cell-specificparameters (step 404) and store the conversion results of relationsbetween the parameters of the measured cell and the given cell (406) andcontinue to step 304.

1.1 Verification of the Parameters in the Request (Indication 232)(Steps304, 306 and 308)

This section describes the conditions and criteria, which can be usedfor verifying that the UE 202 will perform inter-frequency positioningmeasurements, which also require gaps (step 304). This is e.g. toprevent the misuse of gaps or erroneous requests. The unnecessaryconfigured gaps lead to loss of downlink throughput and uplinkthroughput therefore they should be assigned only when necessary.

The radio network node 204 (responsible node 204) verifies theparameters and takes an action:

-   -   if the verification has not passed, go to the next step e.g.        acquire more information or ignore the request (step 306),    -   if the verification has passed, go to the next step e.g.        deciding if configure measurement gaps and determine the        positioning measurement gap configuration (steps 308 and 310).

These verification rules may also be used e.g. for protocol testing suchas joint protocol testing for RRC or LPP testing.

The verification may be considered as passed when at least one or anycombination of the pre-defined conditions is met. For example, thepre-defined conditions may be as follows:

-   -   the indicated cell ID is a possible neighbor,        -   e.g. based on the information from O&M or a neighbor            relation table (e.g. ANR) which may be maintained by the            radio network node 204 (responsible node 204),    -   the positioning session identifier, if provided, is reliable        (e.g., unique, not repeating among UEs, not repeating for the        same UE over a long period, follows a certain to pattern),        -   in one embodiment, the session identification may be a            function of the user identification,        -   in another embodiment, the pattern is shared, e.g. obtained            by signaling or pre-configured, between the radio network            node 204 (responsible node 204, eNodeB 204) and the node            configuring the positioning session (e.g. the positioning            node 206).    -   the positioning method for which measurement gaps are requested        is supported in the network,        -   e.g. based on the information from O&M,    -   the UE 202 supports inter-frequency positioning measurements        -   e.g., based on received UE capabilities or indication from            another network node (e.g. the positioning node 206),    -   the UE 202 in question has an on-going positioning session or        has been requested to perform inter-frequency measurements for        positioning. This can be determined by the radio network node in        many ways e.g.        -   the radio network node 204 (responsible node 204) has            received an indication from a network node (e.g. the            positioning node 206 or a core network node such as MME),        -   the indication has been triggered by LPP in the UE 202 and            received by the radio network node 204,        -   the indication has been triggered by LPPe in the UE 202 and            received by the radio network node 204,        -   discovering the on-going positioning session by packet            sniffing in the radio network node 204,    -   there is at least one on-going positioning session via the radio        network node 204 (responsible node 204, eNodeB 204) and the        radio network node 204 may or may not be aware of the        positioning session details (e.g. UE ID),    -   the UE 202 requires measurement gaps for inter-frequency        measurements (e.g. CA UEs may not need measurement gaps),        -   e.g. based on received capabilities of the UE 202,    -   at least a threshold number of the indicated frequency(s) (e.g.,        one, all) are non-serving frequency(s),    -   at least a threshold number of the indicated frequency(s) (e.g.,        one, all) are supported by the UE 202 and/or network and/or        potential neighbors,        -   e.g. based on received capabilities of the UE 202, O&M            information, information from other radio nodes received via            X2,    -   at least a threshold number of the indicated frequency(s) (e.g.,        one, all) are used for positioning in the network and/or in the        local area,        -   e.g., based on the information from O&M or the positioning            node 206,    -   at least a threshold number of the indicated frequency(s) (e.g.,        one, all) have PRS configured,    -   a pre-configured relation exists between the serving frequency        and the indicated inter-frequency, e.g.,        -   the inter-frequency shall be higher than the serving            frequency,        -   the inter-frequency shall be lower than the serving            frequency,    -   the positioning assistance data and the parameters in the        indication message are consistent,        -   e.g., based on the information from the positioning node 206            or UE 202 (e.g. if the UE 202 may relay the assistance data            or its parts),    -   the reference signal (RS) configuration for signals used for        positioning of neighbors are consistent with the parameters        (e.g., cell IDs, frequencies and/or offsets) that are present in        the indication message 232, e.g. the offsets are consistent with        PRS positioning occasions on the indicated frequencies for at        least some neighbor cells or the offsets values belong to a        feasible set satisfying restrictions on PRS subframe offset such        as prsSubframeOffset or similar signaled to facilitate        positioning (e.g. via a positioning protocol such as LPP). The        RS configuration of neighbors may be obtained e.g. via        cross-layer signaling in multi-frequency and multi-standard        nodes or via an inter-node interface or signaling via/from O&M,        positioning node or neighbor radio nodes,    -   the requested periodicity is consistent with the measurement        occasions periodicity for the requested frequency, cell, etc.    -   the requested measurement gaps by the UE 202 are consistent with        other UEs' requests, e.g. the offsets do not differ by more than        X subframes from those received from other UEs for the same        frequency,    -   an emergency indication is on. For example, in particular        embodiment, the emergency indication shall be on when there is        an on-going emergency session for the UE 202 or an emergency        event has been identified in the network.

The actions given above as examples (requesting an indication orconfirmation from another network node, packet sniffing, requesting a UEcapability, PRS or SFN information from O&M, PRS information frompositioning node, information from neighbor radio nodes, etc.) may beperformed pro-actively or triggered in the radio network node 204(responsible node 204) upon receiving the indication 232 (measurementgap request 232).

2A. DETERMINATION AND OPTIMIZATION OF GAP CONFIGURATION BASED ON THEPARAMETERS IN THE GAP REQUEST (STEP 312) (FIG. 5'S STEP 502)

The measurement gap configuration 234 is determined and optimizedaccounting for the information (parameters) in the indication/request232 (see FIG. 5's step 502). The optimization may imply configuringmeasurement gaps with an offset which is not exactly the same asrequested but close (e.g. does not differ by more than the maximumpositioning occasion duration which is 6 subframes for OTDOA).

The optimization may also account for at least one of

-   -   Bandwidth (e.g., serving cell bandwidth or maximum allowed        measurement bandwidth or PRS measurement bandwidth),    -   Positioning measurement requirements (e.g. such as RSTD        requirements in 3GPP TS 36.133),    -   UE CQI reporting configuration, e.g. to not loose the CQI        reports from that UE 202. For example, the measurement gaps may        be configured to not overlap or to ensure minimum overlap with        the CQI measurement and reporting periods.    -   UE DRX configuration, e.g., so that measurement reports (may be        for positioning and non-positioning measurements performed by        the UE 202) are sent during DRX ON periods and the current DRX        configuration is not “disturbed” or the impact is minimized by        the measurement gaps to be used for positioning,    -   Restricted measurement patterns (e.g. for inter-frequency RRM        measurements) or ABS patterns of neighbor cells—e.g. those that        may be used with eICIC. For example, the gaps may be configured        to maximum overlap with measurement occasions indicated by the        patterns for inter-frequency/inter-RAT cells for UEs in the        given cell.    -   CQI restricted measurement patterns (e.g. those used for eICIC),        e.g. the measurement gaps may be configured to minimum overlap        with the allowed occasions for CQI measurements that are to be        performed for the serving cell.

2B. DECIDING THE GAP CONFIGURATION FOR THE UE WHEN MULTIPLEPOSSIBILITIES FOR GAP CONFIGURATIONS ARE INDICATED (STEP 312) (FIG. 5'SSTEPS 504 AND 506) (FIG. 6)

When multiple alternatives are possible for the information provided inthe measurement gap indication/request 232, the radio network node 204(responsible node 204) may take at least one of the following actions todecide the measurement gap configuration 234 (FIG. 5's steps 504 and506):

-   -   Sort out (e.g., exclude, do not configure) the options that        cannot be verified (e.g. for frequencies outside a        pre-determined set) (FIG. 6's step 602).    -   Sort out (e.g., exclude, do not configure) the options that have        not passed verification (FIG. 6's step 602).    -   Use a pre-defined measurement gap configuration response to the        received indicator/request 232 (FIG. 6's step 604):        -   May be the same configuration for all UEs in the cell or for            all UEs in the center part of the cell (e.g. UEs with TA or            RSRP in a given range) or for a group of UEs that are            expected to be in certain part of the cell (e.g. UEs            reporting the same set of strongest neighbors).    -   Configure measurement gaps for a pre-defined frequency,        irrespective of the frequencies in the indicator/request 232        (FIG. 6's step 606).    -   Decide the best optimized (or the closest to the optimal)        measurement gap option according to e.g. methods for optimizing        measurement gap configuration (FIG. 6's step 608). Some examples        of a closest to the optimal measurement configuration are        closest in time to the requested offset or closest to a given        number of neighbor cells on the frequency, or closest to the        largest overlap with the RS to be measured.    -   Use the measurement gap option which implies the measurement gap        configuration closest to the currently configured measurement        gap configuration for the requesting UE 202 (see FIG. 6's step        610).    -   Configure measurement gaps for the most suitable frequency (see        FIG. 6's step 612), where the most suitable frequency may be:        -   With the largest system or PRS bandwidth,        -   With the shortest PRS periodicity,        -   Lowest frequency when better hearability is needed,        -   With the sufficiently many neighbor cells or sites (e.g.            there are at least X cells or at least Y sites operating on            this frequency) in an area,        -   With better or continuous coverage,        -   Where lower interference is expected.

2C. DECIDING WHETHER TO CONFIGURE/RECONFIGURE MEASUREMENT GAPS FORPOSITIONING (STEP 312) (FIG. 5'S STEP 508)

In particular embodiments of the present invention, the measurement gapconfiguration/reconfiguration decision is made based on a priority level(step 312) (FIG. 5's step 508). The priority level can be pre-defined orconfigured by a network node (e.g., the radio network node 204, thepositioning node 206, core network node etc). In one embodiment, thepriority may be zero, which corresponds to a decision to not configuremeasurement gaps for the received request 232 indicating the need formeasurement gaps for positioning.

The priority for configuring or reconfiguring the measurement gaps maybe based on or linked to one or more of the following (though notlimited to the examples below):

-   -   General client type or LCS Client Type,    -   Positioning service type (e.g. related to the severity of the        positioning service, LCS commercial, LCS emergency etc.)    -   Requested positioning measurement(s) type (e.g., OTDOA RSTD        measurement, E-CID UE Rx-Tx time difference, E-CID RSRP or RSRQ,        etc.),    -   The time elapsed from the last measurement gap configuration        configured by the radio network node 204 (responsible node 204)        does not exceed a certain threshold (e.g. in this case        reconfiguration may be delayed or rejected),        -   In one embodiment, the last measurement gap configuration is            not related to positioning measurements,        -   In another embodiment, the last measurement gap            configuration is related to positioning measurements,    -   The number of measurement gap requests for positioning        measurements exceeds a certain threshold over a certain period,    -   Another measurement gap request has been earlier received for        the same positioning session,    -   The measurement gap configuration has been already configured        for a positioning session with a given identifier,    -   On-going positioning measurement(s) type if any e.g., OTDOA RSTD        measurement, E-CID such as UE Rx-Tx time difference etc. This is        because the new positioning measurement may affect the        performance of the existing ones. This may also be related to        the maximum allowed reporting criteria and the maximum possible        measurements (e.g. the reporting criteria as UE requirements may        be not enough for all possible measurements, therefore a        priority decision may need to be taken).    -   On-going non-positioning measurement(s) type if any e.g., RRM or        mobility, MDT, SON etc. especially in case the on-going        non-positioning measurements will be interrupted or requirements        will become worse in the case of starting new positioning        measurements. This may also be related to the set of reporting        criteria specified for UEs.    -   Estimated period over which measurement gap has to be        configured. This in turn depends upon the measurement session        for a given service. For example, a higher priority may be set        in case a shorter time is needed for gap-assisted measurement        session. This is because a shorter time over which gap-assisted        measurements causes less degradation of the serving cell        performance (e.g., lower throughput loss),    -   Required performance of serving cell. The gap assisted        measurement degrades the serving cell performance. For example,        gap assistance measurements may have lower priority if it is        necessary to maintain certain serving cell performance, which        cannot be achieved when gaps are configured. The serving cell        performance may e.g. relate to the on-going service, requested        service, on-going non-positioning or positioning measurements,        requested positioning measurements.

The measurement gap indicator/request 232 for positioning may e.g. begiven a higher priority or always satisfied (top priority) e.g. when:

-   -   There is an on-going emergency session for the concerned UE 202        (e.g. emergency call or texting) or has the emergency indication        ON in the request message.    -   The coverage on the serving frequency is poor or the number of        bearable neighbors on the serving frequency is expected to be        small (e.g., when the serving frequency is used for indoor        coverage only and/or for lower power nodes such as femto or pico        nodes).    -   The serving cell is a lower power node (e.g., femto cell or pico        cell).    -   The serving cell is weak (e.g., when the UE 202 is at the edge        or in the cell range expansion region.

The verification step for the indicator/request 232 may be performedprior to or after the decision to configure measurement gaps forpositioning in certain embodiments of the present invention.

2D. MEASUREMENT RAP CONFIGURATION FLOW AND RULES FOR DECIDING WHETHER TOSTOP MEASUREMENT GAPS CONFIGURED FOR THE PURPOSE OF POSITIONING (STEP312) (FIG. 5'S STEP 510)

It is common to use timers or stop indications to stop certainprocesses. A stop indication may also be transmitted when measurementgaps are not needed any more for inter-frequency RSTD measurements. Astraightforward solution is to stop the measurement gaps upon such arequest if they have not been used by the UE 202 before configuring themfor the positioning purpose. However, the solution is less trivial ife.g. the measurement gaps have been used for other purposes.

In particular embodiments of the present invention, the radio networknode 204 (responsible node 204) can perform the following steps inrelation to measurement gap configuration for the purpose ofpositioning:

-   -   1. When the indication/request 232 for measurement gaps for        positioning is received, decide whether the measurement gaps are        to be configured (e.g. according to any of the methods described        herein) and continue if the decision is positive or stop at this        step otherwise.    -   2. If the earlier configured measurement gaps are to be        reconfigured, store the current measurement gap configuration        before configuring a new one for positioning or turn on an        indicator for this UE 202 indicating that another measurement        gap configuration has been used or save the reference/index of        the measurement gap configuration used.        -   a. In one embodiment a limited set of measurement gap            configurations may be used in the cell, e.g. in the simplest            case: general measurement gap configuration and measurement            gap configuration for positioning, so the radio network node            204 (responsible node 204) may just switch between the two            configurations upon receiving the measurement gap indication            message or the stop indication message for switching back.    -   3. Configure measurement gaps for positioning.    -   4. When a stop indication is received or a timer is expired or        another trigger for stopping positioning measurement gaps        occurs, stop positioning measurement gaps and:        -   a. If other measurement gap configuration was used before            positioning measurement gaps were configured and no event            indicating no need for the old gaps has occurred, restore            the old configuration, or        -   b. If a need for measurement gap configuration is different            from that for positioning has aroused while the positioning            measurement gaps have been used, then reconfigure            measurement gaps for the purpose other than positioning (in            one embodiment, switch to a default one non-positioning            configuration).

2E. METHODS AND RULES/REQUIREMENTS FOR CONFIGURING MEASUREMENT GAPSBASED ON OTHER MEASUREMENTS (STEP 312) (FIG. 5'S STEP 512) (FIG. 7'SSTEPS 702 AND 704)

According to one embodiment the radio network node 204 (responsible node204) takes into account non-positioning gap assistant measurements e.g.mobility, SON, MDT etc to decide whether to configure/reconfiguremeasurement gaps for positioning measurements or not. This situation mayarise especially:

-   -   When the on-going gaps need to be shifted in time to ensure that        the PRS signals fall in the gap (FIG. 7's step 702); or    -   Currently gap configuration is not applicable for positioning        measurements e.g. gap id #1 is used but gap id #0 is needed for        positioning (FIG. 7's step 704).

In one example if several gap-assisted mobility measurements (e.g. morethan N measurements in parallel) are performed by the UE 202 in parallelthen the radio network node 204 (responsible node 204) may slightlydelay the gap configuration for the positioning measurements. The reasonis to prevent unnecessary delay in mobility measurements since moremeasurements in parallel lead to longer delay.

In another example, if there are on-going gap-assisted mobilitymeasurements (e.g. more than N measurements in parallel) and the gaps donot have to be shifted then the radio network node 204 (responsible node204) may allow the UE 202 to perform positioning measurements in thegaps.

In another example, if no non-positioning measurements being performedthen the radio network node 204 (responsible node 204) may assign thegaps for positioning measurements but may also use this opportunity forobtaining other gaps assistant measurements from the UE 202 e.g.mobility, SON, MDT etc.

The following are two pre-determined rules which can be specified toallow the UE 202 to perform one or more best effort gap-assistedmeasurements in conjunction with the gap assistant positioningmeasurements. The two rules are described below:

1. According to one pre-determined rule when the UE 202 is assigned gapsfor positioning measurements then the UE 202 shall also perform one ormore measurements in best effort manner e.g. SON or MDT measurements.The best effort implies that the UE 202 does not have to meet strictrequirements. Note that in this case the assigned gaps may also be usedby the UE 202 for other measurements (e.g. mobility measurements such asRSRP) in addition to the positioning measurements.

2. According to the second pre-determined rule when the UE 202 isperforming only positioning measurements in the assigned gaps, then theUE 202 shall also perform one or more measurements in a best effortmanner e.g. SON or MDT measurements. The difference compared to thefirst example of the pre-defined rule is that in this case the besteffort measurements are performed by the UE 202 when only thepositioning measurements are done in the gaps. The advantage is that theperformance of the best effort measurements is better compared to thosedone according to the first pre-defined rule. The reason is thatrelatively fewer measurements are performed in the gaps. A furtherrefinement of this rule could be that the best effort measurements mayonly be performed when a particular type of positioning measurements(e.g. OTDOA) are performed in the gaps.

The set of best effort measurements can also be pre-defined or they canbe configured by the radio network node 204 (responsible node 204).

3. METHODS AND RULES/REQUIREMENTS FOR CONFIGURING MEASUREMENT GAPSENSURING THAT POSITIONING MEASUREMENT REQUIREMENTS ARE MET

In particular embodiments of the present invention, the radio networknode 204 (responsible node 204) may be required to configure measurementgaps for positioning under certain requirements, e.g. within a certaintime after receiving the indication/request 232 for the positioningmeasurement gaps. The time requirement may be a fixed maximum time ormay depend, e.g., on the expected duration of the positioning session(e.g. on Tprs, or PRS periodicity). The time requirement may also dependon the positioning method and the UE DRX state, e.g. a longer time maybe allowed for E-CID for UEs in DRX or for OTDOA.

4. EXPLOITING THE CO-SITED OR MULTI-FREQUENCY OR MULTI-RAT NODES

In particular embodiments of the present invention, the radio networknode 204 (responsible node 204) can make the decision onconfiguring/reconfiguring or stopping (a special form of reconfiguring)measurement gaps based on the information about other frequencies/bandsand RATs as well as positioning-related configuration (e.g. radio nodeactivity periods, PRS availability, PRS periodicity, PRS offset,feasible set of PRS configurations or restrictions on them e.g. arestriction on PRS subframe offset such as prsSubframeOffset signaledaccording to between two cells, etc,) or internal node measurementsobtained from:

-   -   a co-located node, or via cross-layer communication with a        functional block responsible for another RAT or frequency/band,        or    -   internal information about the other frequency/band/RAT        supported by the node, where the node may be e.g.        multi-frequency or multi-band node, multi-RAT node or        multi-standard radio (MSR) node.

In one embodiment, the information obtained as described above may beused to avoid acquiring similar information from other nodes e.g. via X2or via O&M when e.g. it is expected that the configuration of othernodes on frequency f2 is the same as the configuration of this(multi-frequency/bad/RAT) node or co-located node on the same frequencyf2. For example, PRS periodicity may be the same in all macro cells onthe same frequency and in addition the PRS occasions in these cells mayoverlap or be synchronized or aligned. Therefore, X2-signaling may beavoided by acquiring the PRS configuration on f2 of the cells associatedwith the current (multi-frequency/band/RAT) or co-located node. Thisembodiment may also be combined with other embodiments described herein,e.g., methods and rules for deciding measurement gap configuration basedon a received request for measurement gaps for positioning, includingverification, or methods and rules/requirements for configuringmeasurement gaps based on other measurements such as mobilitymeasurements (e.g. RSRP, RSRQ etc).

In another embodiment, a network node (e.g. O&M, SON, core network,another radio network node e.g. via X2 a macro BS may provide suchinformation to smaller BSs in its area or other neighbor macro BSs, etc)may configure the radio network node 204 (e.g. eNode B) with theinformation which indicates whether all cells on certain carrier in anarea or co-located cells in all nodes in the area on certain carrierfrequencies/RATs have similar positioning configuration setting or not.For example, assume the network node has co-located cells on f1, f2 andf3. The network node may inform each eNode B that all cells on each ofthe frequencies supporting positioning (in one example) or only on f1and f3 (in another example) in the network have similar or even the sameconfiguration or setting related to positioning e.g. PRS BW, PRSperiodicity, positioning sub-frames in a positioning occasion etc. Inanother embodiment, the parameters of the positioning-relatedconfiguration (e.g. PRS periodicity, PRS offset, PRS bandwidth, PRSsubframes per positioning occasion, etc.) that are similar in theindicated cells may also be a part of the information provided by thenetwork node.

5. UE AUTONOMOUS MEASUREMENT GAPS FOR POSITIONING

In particular embodiments of the present invention, the UE 202 mayconfigure autonomous gaps for positioning measurements (e.g.inter-frequency E-CID or OTDOA measurements) or MDT. The autonomous gapconfiguration can be based on a pre-defined rule. For instance theconfiguration can be based on the type of the service which in turn maydepend upon specific type of measurements. For example, according to onepre-defined rule the UE 202 is:

-   -   Allowed to autonomously configure the gaps for inter-frequency        OTDOA measurements. In one embodiment, the OTDOA measurements        may be specifically used in relation to emergency calls (e.g. an        emergency even is identified by the UE 202 e.g. by indication        from the network or an emergency session is on-going).    -   Autonomous gap configuration may be allowed in a power saving        mode or IDLE state or DRX or in case there is a poor connection        to the serving cell or reference cell.    -   Not allowed to autonomously configure E-CID inter-frequency        and/or inter-RAT measurements (e.g. RSRP, RSRQ, CPICH RSCP etc).

According to another pre-defined rule the UE 202 is allowed toautonomously configure gaps for a group or category of gap-assistantpositioning measurements. The group of measurements can be indicated bya network node (e.g. eNodeB 204, radio network node 204, or thepositioning node 206). For example group 0 and group 1 comprises ofinter-frequency to OTDOA measurements and inter-frequency E-CIDmeasurements respectively. As an example the radio network node 204(eNodeB 204) can indicate to the UE 202 that it can autonomously usegaps for group 1 measurements. Hence, the UE 202 when measuring group 1measurements can autonomously configure the gaps. In a special case, agroup may consist of one measurement.

6. CONCLUSION

From the foregoing, the skilled person having the foregoing teachingwill readily appreciate that among other things a radio network node 204(e.g., eNodeB 204, responsible node 204) is described above forconfiguring a measurement gap for positioning to be used by a UE 202.Thus, in particular embodiments, the described solutions provide:

-   -   Methods and rules for deciding measurement gap configuration        based on a received request for measurement gaps for        positioning, e.g. for        -   Verifying the parameters in the request,        -   Optimizing the gap configuration based on the parameters in            the gap request,        -   Deciding the gap configuration for a UE when multiple            possibilities for gap configurations are indicated,        -   Deciding whether to configure/reconfigure measurement gaps            for positioning e.g. based on priority,        -   Deciding whether to stop measurement gaps based on the stop            indication,        -   Deciding whether to configure/reconfigure measurement gaps            for positioning based on non-positioning gap assistant            measurements e.g. mobility, SON, MDT etc.    -   Methods and rules/requirements for configuring measurement gaps        ensuring that positioning measurement requirements are met.

The present invention has several technical advantages some of which areas follows:

-   -   Improved positioning accuracy due to optimized positioning        measurement gap configuration.    -   Determined behavior for nodes configuring measurement gaps.    -   Enabled verification of the data transmitted in the positioning        measurement gap request and minimizing the probability of the        signaling misuse.    -   Pre-defined rules for positioning measurement gap requests are        helpful for consistent UE and eNodeB behavior, which may also be        tested.    -   Minimized disturbance to other UE measurements during        inter-frequency positioning measurement thanks to optimized        positioning measurement gap configuration.    -   Low-overhead communication making radio nodes aware when the        positioning related configuration is similar or the same in all        cells in certain frequencies.    -   Further reduced communication overhead with        multi-frequency/multi-band/multi-RAT/MSR/mixed-mode nodes and        with co-located nodes.

The example UE 202 illustrated in FIG. 2 includes the antenna 208, thetransceiver 210, the processor 212, and the memory 214. In particularembodiments, some or all of the functionality described above as beingprovided by the UE 202 or another form of mobile communication devicemay be provided by the processor 212 executing instructions stored on acomputer-readable medium, such as the memory 214. Alternativeembodiments of the UE 202 may include additional components beyond thoseshown in FIG. 2 that may be responsible for providing certain aspects ofthe UE's functionality, including any of the functionality describedabove and/or any functionality necessary to support the solutionsdescribed above.

The example radio network node 204 (e.g. base station 204) shown in FIG.2 includes the antenna 216, the transceiver 218, the network interface220, the processor 222, and the memory 224. In particular embodiments,some or all of the functionality described above as being provided bythe radio network node 204 which can be for instance a mobile basestation, a base station controller, a node B, an enhanced node B, and/orany other type of mobile communications node may be provided by theprocessor 222 executing instructions stored on a computer-readablemedium, such as the memory 224 shown in FIG. 2. Alternative embodimentsof the radio network node 204 may include additional componentsresponsible for providing additional functionality, including any of thefunctionality identified above and/or any functionality necessary tosupport the solution described above.

The example positioning server 206 shown in FIG. 2 includes the networkinterface 226, the processor 228, and the memory 230. In particularembodiments, some or all of the functionality described above as beingprovided by the positioning server 206 which can be for instance anE-SMLC, a SLP, and/or any other type of node involved in the describedpositioning services may be provided by the processor 228 executinginstructions stored on a computer-readable medium, such as the memory230 shown in FIG. 2. Alternative embodiments of the positioning server206 may include additional components responsible for providingadditional functionality, including any of the functionality identifiedabove and/or any functionality necessary to support the solutiondescribed above.

The skilled person should appreciate that the embodiments describedherein are not limited to the currently standardized positioningmeasurements and methods. Furthermore, the following should berecognized in reading the description above:

1. The assistance data used in the present invention shall be understoodin a broader sense as the data transmitted by a network node 204 to theUE 202 in order to assist in positioning measurements. The assistancedata comprises at least a list of two cells (e.g., cell identifiers). Inone specific example the assistance data is OTDOA assistance data inLTE.

2. Although the description is mainly given for UE, it should beunderstood by the skilled in the art that “UE” is a non-limiting termwhich means any wireless device or node (e.g. PDA, laptop, mobile,sensor, fixed relay, mobile relay or even a small base station that isbeing positioned when timing measurements for positioning areconsidered, i.e. a LCS target in general). The present invention mayapply both for UEs capable and not capable of performing inter-frequencymeasurements without gaps, e.g. also including UEs capable of carrieraggregation.

3. A cell is associated with a radio node, where a radio node or radionetwork node or eNodeB (all of which are used interchangeably herein)comprise in a general sense any node transmitting radio signals that maybe used for positioning, measurements, e.g., eNodeB, macro/micro/picobase station, home eNodeB, relay, beacon device, or repeater. More thanone cells may also be associated with a radio node. The radio node mayalso be a multi-RAT or multi-standard radio (MSR) node.

4. The positioning node 206 described in different embodiments is a nodewith positioning functionality. For example, for LTE the positioningnode 206 may be understood as a positioning platform in the user plane(e.g., SLP in LTE) or a positioning node in the control plane (e.g.,E-SMLC in LTE). SLP may also include SLC and SPC, where SPC may alsohave a proprietary interface with E-SMLC. In a testing environment, atleast the positioning node may be simulated or emulated by testequipment.

5. The signaling described herein is either via direct links or logicallinks (e.g. via higher layer protocols and/or via one or more networknodes). For example, in LTE in the case of signaling between E-SMLC andLCS Client the positioning result may be transferred via multiple nodes(at least via MME and GMLC).

6. The described solutions are not limited to implementation only in LTEnetworks, but may apply with any RAN, single- or multi-RAT. Some otherRAT examples are LTE-Advanced, UMTS, GSM, cdma2000, WiMAX, and WiFi.

7. The present invention and in particular the embodiments involvingsignaling or autonomous identification and usage of the indication ofthe timing information awareness may be, with straightforward changes,applied in any network and network nodes that rely on the availabilityof the timing information of at least some cells, which, withoutsignaling or autonomous identification, would not be able to providereliable service. One service, example is positioning, and the networknode example is the positioning node 206.

Although multiple embodiments of the present invention have beenillustrated in the accompanying Drawings and described in the foregoingDetailed Description, it should be understood that the invention is notlimited to the disclosed embodiments, but instead is also capable ofnumerous rearrangements, modifications and substitutions withoutdeparting from the is present invention that as has been set forth anddefined within the following claims.

The invention claimed is:
 1. A radio network node for configuring ameasurement gap for positioning to be used by a user equipment (UE), theradio network node comprising: a memory configured to storeprocessor-executable instructions; and a processor configured tointerface with the memory and, by executing the processor-executableinstructions, to: receive an indication from the UE indicating that theUE needs measurement gaps for positioning; verify parameters in theindication to determine if one or more pre-defined conditions are met toindicate that the UE is able to perform inter-frequency positioningmeasurements; decide whether to configure the measurement gaps, inresponse to deciding to configure the measurement gaps, determine ameasurement gap configuration and send the measurement gap configurationto the UE; perform at least one of deciding whether to configure themeasurement gaps and verifying the parameters based on internalmeasurements or information obtained from a co-located node or viacross-layer communication; and wherein the memory and processor arecomponents of the radio network node.
 2. The radio network node of claim1, wherein the indication comprises one or more of the followingparameters: a need indication; a measurement gap purpose; one or morefrequencies; one or more offsets indicating an occurrence ofmeasurements that require measurement gaps; one or more pairs, each paircomprising a frequency and a corresponding offset for that frequency; aperiodicity of measurements that require measurement gaps or a preferredmeasurement gap pattern; cell identifications; a radio access technology(RAT); a type of service or session; an emergency indication; and anoverall duration over which the measurement gaps are required.
 3. Theradio network node of claim 1, wherein the processor is furtherconfigured to receive the indication by: determining if the indicationhas information for the measured cell relative to a given cell; and inresponse to determining the indication has information for the measuredcell relative to a given cell, converting the information to acorresponding cell-specific parameter and storing the conversion resultsof relations between parameters of the measured cell and the given cell.4. The radio network node of claim 1, wherein the processor is furtherconfigured to verify the parameters by acquiring additional informationto determine if the UE will perform inter-frequency positioningmeasurements.
 5. The radio network node of claim 1, wherein theprocessor is further configured to verify the parameters by determiningif one or more of the following pre-defined conditions are met: anindicated cell identification is of a possible neighbor cell; arequested positioning method is supported by a network associated withthe radio network node; a positioning session identifier, if provided,is reliable; the UE supports inter-frequency positioning measurements orthe UE requires measurement gaps for inter-frequency measurements; theUE has an on-going positioning session or has been requested to performinter-frequency measurements for positioning; at least one positioningsession via the radio network node is on-going; parameters in theindication are consistent with assistance data or a reference signalconfiguration of one or more serving or neighbour radio network nodes;the measurement gaps requested by the UE are consistent with other UEs'requests; at least a threshold number of the indicated frequency(s) arenon-serving frequency(s); at least a threshold number of the indicatedfrequency(s) are supported by at least one of the UE, a network andpotential neighboring radio network nodes, at least a threshold numberof the indicated frequency(s) are used for positioning in at east one ofnetwork and local area; at least a threshold number of the indicatedfrequency(s) have a positioning reference signal (PRS) configured; apre-configured relation exists between serving frequency and theindicated inter-frequency; a requested periodicity is consistent withmeasurement occasions periodicity for a requested frequency and cell;parameters in the indication are consistent with positioning assistancedata sent to the UE by positioning node; and an emergency session forthe UE is on-going or an emergency event has been identified in thenetwork.
 6. The radio network node of claim 1, wherein the processor isfurther configured to determine the measurement gap configuration byoptimizing the configured measurement gaps based on the parameters inthe indication and configure measurement gaps with an offset which isnot the same as in the indication.
 7. The radio network node of claim 1,wherein the processor is further configured to determine the measurementgap configuration by determining if there are multiple options forconfiguring the measurement gaps that are possible in accordance withthe received indication.
 8. The radio network node of claim 7, whereinthe processor is further configured to determine that there are multipleoptions for configuring the measurement gaps and, in response todetermining that there are multiple options, decide the measurement gapconfiguration by performing at least one of the following: sorting outmeasurement gaps that cannot be verified or do not pass verification;using a pre-defined measurement gap configuration responsive to thereceived indication; using a measurement gap for a pre-defined frequencyirrespective of frequencies in the indication; using a best optimizedmeasurement gap configuration; using a measurement gap configurationclosest to a currently configured measurement gap for the UE; and usinga measurement gap configuration for a most suitable frequency which isone of: a frequency with largest positioning reference signalingbandwidth; a frequency with shortest positioning reference signalingperiodicity; a lowest frequency; a frequency at which multiplenon-sewing cells operate; a frequency with most continuous coverage; anda frequency with lowest interference.
 9. The radio network node of claim1, wherein the processor is further configured to determine themeasurement gap configuration by determining whether to configure orreconfigure the measurement gap for positioning purposes based on apriority level.
 10. The radio network node of claim 9, wherein factorsfor determining the priority level include one or more of the following:a general client type or location service (LCS) Client Type, apositioning service type; a requested positioning measurement(s) type;whether a time elapsed from last measurement gap configurationconfigured by the radio network node does not exceed a certainthreshold; whether a number of measurement gap requests for positioningmeasurements exceeds a certain threshold over a certain period; whetheranother measurement gap request has been earlier received for the samepositioning session; whether a measurement gap configuration has beenalready configured for a positioning session with a given identifier; anon-going positioning measurement(s) type if any; an on-goingnon-positioning measurement(s) type; an estimated period over which themeasurement gap has to be configured; and a required performance of aserving cell related to service and/or positioning or non-positioningmeasurements.
 11. The radio network node of claim 1, wherein theindication for positioning is given a higher priority when at least oneof: (1) an emergency session for the UE is on-going; (2) coverage on aserving frequency is below a threshold or a number of hearable neighborson the serving frequency is expected to be below a threshold; (3) aserving cell is a lower power node; and (4) a serving cell is weak whenthe UE is at an edge or in a cell range expansion region.
 12. The radionetwork node of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured tostop the measurement gap configuration for positioning purposes when astop indication is received or a timer is expired or another trigger forstopping positioning measurement gaps occurs then stop configuring themeasurement gaps.
 13. The radio network node of claim 1, wherein theprocessor is further configured to determine the measurement gapconfiguration by determining that an old measurement gap configurationwas used before the determined measurement gap configuration and noevent indicating there is no need for the old measurement gapconfiguration has occurred then restore the old measurement gapconfiguration, or that a need for a measurement gap configurationdifferent from the old measurement gap configuration for positioning hasarisen while the determined measurement gap configuration has been usedand, in response, reconfiguring measurement gaps for a purpose otherthan positioning.
 14. The radio network node of claim 1, wherein theprocessor is further configured to determine the measurement gapconfiguration by deciding whether to configure or reconfigure themeasurement gap configuration for positioning based on non-positioningmeasurements performed in measurement gaps.
 15. The radio network nodeof claim 14, wherein the processor is further configured to decidewhether to reconfigure the measurement gap configuration for positioningbased on non-positioning measurements performed in measurement gapswhen: on-going gaps need to be shifted in time to ensure thatpositioning reference signals fall in the measurement gap; or a currentmeasurement gap configuration is not applicable for positioningmeasurements.
 16. The radio network node of claim 15, wherein thenon-positioning measurements performed in measurement gaps comprise oneor more of the following: mobility measurements; minimization of drivetest (MDT) measurements; and self organizing network (SON) measurements.17. The radio network node of claim 1, wherein one or more parametersused for determining whether to configure the measurement gaps or notare received by the radio network node by one or more mechanisms asfollows: from another radio network node; from another network nodeincluding an Operations & Maintenance (O&M) core network node, a selforganizing network (SON), a minimization of drive test (MDT) node or apositioning node; from UE; by packet sniffing; and in a UE capabilitymessage.
 18. The radio network node of claim 1, wherein the processor isfurther configured to verify the parameters by determining if apre-defined condition as follows is met: a requested positioning methodis supported by a network associated with the radio network node. 19.The radio network node of claim 1, wherein the processor is furtherconfigured to verify the parameters by determining if a pre-definedcondition as follows is met: the UE supports inter-frequency positioningmeasurements or the UE requires measurement gaps for inter-frequencymeasurements.
 20. The radio network node of claim 1, wherein theprocessor is further configured to verify the parameters by determiningif a pre-defined condition as follows is met: at least a thresholdnumber of the indicated frequency(s) are non-serving frequency(s). 21.The radio network node of claim 1, wherein the processor is furtherconfigured to verify the parameters by determining if a pre-definedcondition as follows is met: at least a threshold number of theindicated frequency(s) are supported by at least one of the UE, anetwork and potential neighboring radio network nodes.
 22. A methodimplemented by a radio network node for configuring a measurement gapfor performing at least one positioning measurement to be used by a userequipment (UE), the method comprising the steps of: receiving, by theradio network node, an indication from the UE indicating that the UEneeds measurement gaps for positioning; verifying, by the radio networknode, parameters in the indication to determine if one or morepredefined conditions are met to indicate that the UE is able to performinter-frequency positioning measurements; deciding whether to configurethe measurement gaps in response to deciding to configure themeasurement gaps, determining a measurement gap configuration andsending the measurement gap configuration to the UE; and performing atleast one of deciding whether to configure the measurement gaps andverifying the parameters based on internal measurements or informationobtained from a co-located node or via cross-layer communication. 23.The method of claim 22, wherein the indication comprises one or more ofthe following parameters: a need indication; a measurement gap purpose;one or more frequencies; one or more offsets indicating an occurrence ofmeasurements that require measurement gaps; one or more pairs, each paircomprising a frequency and the corresponding offset for that frequency;periodicity of measurements that require measurement gaps or a preferredmeasurement gap pattern; cell identifications; a radio access technology(RAT); a type of service or session; an emergency indication; and anoverall duration over which the measurement gaps are required.
 24. Themethod of claim 22, wherein the receiving step further comprises thesteps of determining if the indication has information for the measuredcell relative to a given cell and in response to determining theindication has information for the measured cell relative to a givencell, converting the information to a corresponding cell-specificparameter and storing the conversion results of relations betweenparameters of the measured cell and the given cell.
 25. The method ofclaim 22, wherein the verifying step further comprises acquiringadditional information to determine if the UE will performinter-frequency positioning measurements.
 26. The method of claim 22,wherein verifying the parameters further comprises determining if one ormore of the following pre-defined condition are met: an indicated cellidentification is a possible neighbor cell; a requested positioningmethod is supported by a network associated with the radio network node;a positioning session identifier, if provided, is reliable; the UEsupports inter-frequency positioning measurements r or the UE requiresmeasurement gaps for inter-frequency measurements; the UE has anon-going positioning session or has been requested to performinter-frequency measurements for positioning; at least one positioningsession via the radio network node is on-going; parameters in theindication are consistent with assistance data or RS configuration ofone or more serving or neighbour radio network nodes; the measurementgaps requested by the UE are consistent with other UEs' requests; atleast a threshold number of the indicated frequency(s) are non-servingfrequency(s); at least a threshold number of the indicated frequency(s)are supported by at least one of the UE, a network and potentialneighboring radio network nodes, at least a threshold number of theindicated frequency(s) are used for positioning in at least one ofnetwork and local area; at least a threshold number of the indicatedfrequency(s) have positioning reference signal (PRS) configured; apre-configured relation exists between serving frequency and theindicated inter-frequency; a requested periodicity is consistent withmeasurement occasions periodicity for requested frequency and cell;parameters in the indication are consistent with positioning assistancedata sent to the UE by positioning node; and an emergency session forthe UE is on-going or an emergency event has been identified in thenetwork.
 27. The method of claim 22, wherein determining the measurementgap configuration comprises optimizing the configured measurement gapsbased on the parameters in the indication and configure measurement gapswith an offset which is not the same as in the indication.
 28. Themethod of claim 22, wherein determining the measurement gapconfiguration comprises determining if there are multiple options forconfiguring the measurement gaps that are possible in accordance withthe received indication.
 29. The method of claim 28, further comprisingdetermining that there are multiple options for configuring themeasurement gaps and, in response, deciding the measurement gapconfiguration by performing at least one of the following: sorting outmeasurement gaps that cannot be verified or do not pass verification;using a pre-defined measurement gap configuration responsive to thereceived request; using a measurement gap with pre-defined frequencyirrespective of frequencies in the indication; using a best optimizedmeasurement gap configuration; using a measurement gap configurationclosest to currently configured measurement gap for the UE; and using ameasurement gap configuration for a most suitable frequency which is oneof: a frequency with largest positioning reference signaling bandwidth;a frequency with shortest positioning reference signaling periodicity; alowest frequency; a frequency at which multiple non-sewing cellsoperate; a frequency with most continuous coverage; and a frequency withlowest interference.
 30. The method of claim 22, wherein determining themeasurement gap configuration comprises determining whether to configureor reconfigure the measurement gap for positioning purposes based on apriority level.
 31. The method of claim 30, wherein factors fordetermining the priority level include one or more of the following: ageneral client type or location service (LCS) Client Type, a positioningservice type; a requested positioning measurement(s) type; whether atime elapsed from last measurement gap configuration configured by theradio network node does not exceed a certain threshold; whether a numberof measurement gap requests for positioning measurements exceeds acertain threshold over a certain period; whether another measurement gaprequest has been earlier received for the e positioning session; whethera measurement gap configuration has been already configured for apositioning session with a given identifier; an on-going positioningmeasurement(s) type if any; an on-going non-positioning measurement(s)type; an estimated period over which the measurement gap has to beconfigured; and a required performance of a serving cell related toservice and/or positioning or non-positioning measurements.
 32. Themethod of claim 22, further comprising giving the indication forpositioning a higher priority when at least one of: (1) an emergencysession for the UE is on-going; (2) coverage on a serving frequency isbelow a threshold or a number of bearable neighbors on the servingfrequency is expected to be below a threshold; (3) a serving cell is alower power node; and (4) a serving cell is weak when the UE is at anedge or in a cell range expansion region.
 33. The method of claim 22,further comprising stopping the measurement gap configuration forpositioning purposes when a stop indication is received or a timer isexpired or another trigger for stopping positioning measurement gapsoccurs then stop configuring the measurement gaps.
 34. The method ofclaim 22, wherein determining the measurement gap configurationcomprises determining that an old measurement gap configuration was usedbefore the determined measurement gap configuration and no eventindicating there is no need for the old measurement gap configurationhas occurred then restore the old measurement gap configuration, or thata need for a measurement gap configuration different from the oldmeasurement gap configuration for positioning has arisen while thedetermined measurement gap configuration has been used and, in response,reconfiguring measurement gaps for a purpose other than positioning. 35.The method of claim 22, wherein determining the measurement gapconfiguration comprises deciding whether to configure or reconfigure themeasurement gap configuration for positioning while accounting fornon-positioning measurements performed in measurement gaps.
 36. Themethod of claim 35, when deciding results in reconfiguring themeasurement gap configuration for positioning based on non-positioningmeasurements performed in measurement gaps when: on-going gaps need tobe shifted in time to ensure that positioning reference signals fall inthe measurement gap; or a current measurement gap configuration is notapplicable for positioning measurements.
 37. The method of claim 36,wherein the non-positioning measurements performed in measurement gapscomprises one or more of the following: mobility measurements;minimization of drive test (MDT) measurements; and self organizingnetwork (SON) measurements.
 38. The method of claim 22, wherein one ormore parameters used for determining whether to configure themeasurement gaps or not are received by the radio network node by one ormore mechanisms as follows: from another radio network node; fromanother network node including an Operations & Maintenance (O&M) corenetwork node, a self organizing network (SON), a minimization of drivetest (MDT) node or a positioning node; from UE; by packet sniffing; andin a UE capability message.
 39. The method of claim 22, whereinverifying the parameters further comprises determining if a pre-definedcondition as follows is met: a requested positioning method is supportedby a network associated with the radio network node.
 40. The method ofclaim 22, wherein verifying the parameters further comprises determiningif a pre-defined condition as follows is met: the UE supportsinter-frequency positioning measurements or the UE requires measurementgaps for inter-frequency measurements.
 41. The method of claim 22,wherein verifying the parameters further comprises determining if apre-defined condition as follows is met: at least a threshold number ofthe indicated frequency(s) are non-serving frequency(s).
 42. The methodof claim 22, wherein verifying the parameters further comprisesdetermining if a pre-defined condition as follows is met: at least athreshold number of the indicated frequency(s) are supported by at leastone of the UE, a network and potential neighboring radio network nodes.43. A radio network node for configuring a measurement gap forpositioning to be used by a user equipment (UE), the radio network nodecomprising: a memory configured to store processor-executableinstructions; and a processor configured to interface with the memoryand, by executing the processor-executable instructions, to: receive anindication from the UE indicating that the UE needs measurement gaps forpositioning; verify parameters in the indication to determine if one ormore pre-defined conditions are met to indicate that the UE is able toperform inter-frequency positioning measurements; decide whether toconfigure the measurement gaps, wherein one or more parameters used todecide whether to configure the measurement gaps or not are received bythe radio network node by one or more mechanisms as follows: fromanother radio network node; from another network node comprising anOperations & Maintenance (O&M) core network node, a self organizingnetwork (SON), a minimization of drive test (MDT) node or a positioningnode; from UE; by packet sniffing; and in a UE capability message; inresponse to deciding to configure the measurement gaps, determine ameasurement gap configuration and send the measurement gap configurationto the UE; and wherein the memory and processor are components of theradio network node.
 44. A radio network node for configuring ameasurement gap for positioning to be used by a user equipment (UE), theradio network node comprising: a memory configured to storeprocessor-executable instructions; and a processor configured tointerface with the memory and, by executing the processor-executableinstructions, to: receive an indication from the UE indicating that theUE needs measurement gaps for positioning; verify parameters in theindication to determine if one or more pre-defined conditions are met toindicate that the UE is able to perform inter-frequency positioningmeasurements; decide whether to configure the measurement gaps; inresponse to deciding to configure the measurement gaps, (1) determine ameasurement gap configuration with an offset which is different than arequested offset in the indication, and (2) send the measurement gapconfiguration to the UE; and wherein the memory and processor arecomponents of the radio network node.
 45. The radio network node ofclaim 44, wherein the offset of the determined measurement gapconfiguration is different than the requested offset in the indicationbut does not differ by more than 6 subframes.